|
If a negotiation
is a test, this is the one-page cheat sheet you're allowed to bring with
you. Thorough preparation and practice are the real keys to success.
But a little memory jog when you're under pressure never hurt either.
Below are some of the most powerful pointers we've discovered. Put
them in your pocket.
1. Your power lies in your walk-away alternatives.
Make sure that you have real, viable options that don't require an agreement:
-
You'll be empowered to support your interests.
-
Your confident attitude will compel others to listen
to and meet your interests. They'll realize that they have to if
they intend to obtain agreement.
2. Do not disclose your walk-away alternatives.
When you remind others of the options you have should they not acceptably
satisfy your needs, your commitment to negotiation falls into question,
and the environment becomes hostile. This draws the attention away
from underlying needs, and the climate becomes less conducive to the development
of creative options.
3. Figure out the walk-away alternatives
of the other parties. Knowing what options they have if no agreement
is reached will help you construct options that are favorable relative
to their specific negotiation. In other words, you'll be able to construct
an agreement that improves on their alternativesæa fair agreementæwithout
giving away too much.
Please enter your e-mail
address below to subscribe to our free newletter:
After subscribing, the current edition will be
immediately sent to you.
4. No offer is too high. Any offer
is valid provided you can present objective criteria that prove each term
of the offer fills to some extent the underlying needs of all parties.
5. Don't react emotionally. When
you encounter tactics intended to intimidate, rush, draw out discussions,
or otherwise derail the focus from underlying needs and mutual gain, patiently
react to the problem at hand: The discussion needs to be refocused.
Draw attention back to substantive interests and options that fairly address
those interests. Use personal attacks as a signal that it's time
to reestablish everyone's commitment to a mutually beneficial outcome.
6. Remember that all the needs presented
are not of equal importance. Focus time on building an understanding
of which needs are most likely to influence the outcome. Strive to
create options that satisfy those interests.
7. Listen more than you talk. As
a listener, you are gathering information that can help you figure out
which of the other side's needs must be met for an agreement to be considered
acceptable, and to what degree those needs will have to be met. Listening
gives you the advantage. The better your understanding, the more
flexibility and creativity you'll have as you create options. Talking
gives this advantage to the other side.
8. Know the authority of each person in
the room. Make sure you know whether or not you are negotiating with
someone empowered to make the final decision. If you aren't, make
sure you present options in such a way that they meet the perceived needs
of the negotiator and the other members of their organization.
9. Analyze concessions. Look for
patterns in the types of concessions made by the other parties, and be
attentive to the messages sent by your concessions:
-
Small concessions give the impression that the bottom
line is not far off.
-
Large concessions indicate that a lot more can still
be conceded before the bottom line is reached.
-
Rapid or large concessions undermine the credibility
of the initial offer.
-
All concessions teach the lesson that more concessions
will be made. Never make concessions expecting that the other side will
meet your terms on the next issue. On the contrary, they will expect
more concessions. Remember: When the other side makes a concession
on the terms of a specific issue, it is statistically certain that a second
concession on the same issue can be secured.
10. Never be bludgeoned into splitting the
difference. When an apparent impasse has been reached, splitting
the difference is widely regarded as the ultimate fair solution.
But the suggestion to split the difference is often used to induce guilt.
Guilt is likely to lead to concessions on your partæmaybe even concessions
that lead to an outcome worse for you than splitting the difference.
Additionally, splitting the difference rarely results in an outcome that
surpasses anyone's expectations, and it does not ensure that the interests
of all parties are satisfied.
Please enter your e-mail address
below to subscribe to our free newletter:
After subscribing, the current edition will be
immediately sent to you.
Copyright 2000 Batna.com
|